Sandy Alderson's recent comments along with way.
Pitching: Starting pitching is the strength of the team, no doubt. The Dickey situation is interesting. Sandy suggests that Dickey will be extended or traded. If Dickey is traded, how much would a 38-year-old bring back, even coming off a 20-win season? If Dickey is signed, does Niese go in a package to return some talent? Would we be comfortable with Santana, Dickey, Harvey, Gee, and Wheeler? How about Pelfrey coming back? Young? All in all, the SP should be adequate.
Infield: The IF should be fairly set. Sandy says Wright will be here in 2013 regardless of the contract situation, so we know about the left side of the IF. I don't see Murphy coming back, as he may be a valuable chip, and he's not an Alderson player (no power). I think Ike stays, since as Sandy says, it would be tough to replace 32 HRs and THEN begin to add HRs to this year's total. 3/4 of the IFs likely return, so far we're not seeing all of these significant changes Sandy is talking about.
OF: Ah, here is where Sandy may deliver on the changes he discusses. The Mets need to get better, and to do so, they need 3, not 2, but 3 OFs. Here's the question, where do you get these guys? Niese may return one decent OF, but could Duda and someone else bring back another? Where does the third one come from? Sandy likely has $5-$10 million to spend. Does he spend about $5 million on a third OF? That's not getting BJ Upton, folks. I'm not sure what you get for that much money. However, it will be nice to see new faces in the OF. Bay will probably begin the season with the team. He's harmless as a 4th OF.
Catching: Thole will not be back, he is the antithesis of an Alderson player. Shoppach may be back as the RH platoon. But this position is in DESPERATE need of new blood. Does Alderson spend his remaining $5 million here? But then there's the...
Bullpen/Bench: Does Rauch come back (I'm hearing no)? Frank Frank? They owe him $6 million, so yes. But is he healthy? If Sandy follows my Rx above, he'd have no money left to spend on the pen. Does he need money? Can the Mets ride with Familia, Parnell, Edgin, etc. and use all internal resources in the pen, so the money can be spent on other needs? That's what I would do. As for the bench, Hairston will most likely be gone, since he'll seek (rightfully so) a multi-year deal. Turner HAS to go. They need to do better than him off the bench. Cedeno was reasonable this year, and I'd consider bringing him back, if for no other reason than to conserve money (he was at $1.1 million). Can the other two bench spots be obtained "on the cheap"? Can? It doesn't matter, they'll have to be.
I'd like to make one more point. Sandy talks about the need for the "approach", meaning taking more pitches, leading to a higher OBP. He says one reason for the second half failure was a change in approach, hitters taking fewer pitches. I say, "Yikes". I just don't buy that type of baseball. Bobby O doesn't either. It leads to a lot of 0-2, 1-2 counts. That's defensive hitting. Get ready, folks. That's direction from the top. Our team has become the As of the early 2000s. Forget the excitement of Reyes (or someone else) legging out triples and stealing bases. Forget the flashing of leather. The OBP approach shows that defense can be sacrificed for people who, well, have a high OBP.
This is what it is. Personally, I'll always support anything that says "Mets". This may not be my preferred situation in Queens, but it's all we have right now. 88-74 next year could make this all easier to swallow, right?